What do editors do?
At this website, the working definition of an editor is someone who can understand and comment on the content, logic, and structure of an article/paper or book. An editor should always offer constructive criticism. Authors should expect and welcome well-considered and clear advice. They should expect editors to ask questions about any aspect of the work, including the context such as the intended audience and publication - i.e. anything that can help the editor suggest improvements.
The author always has last word, and can choose to ignore any comments, questions and suggestions, because it is the author, not the editor, who is responsible for the final outcome.
Thorough work like that just described requires time. Editors should spend time both reading and thinking about a piece of writing. Of course they should do this as efficiently and quickly as possible. Editors should also adjust their efforts according to the request of the author. An author may ask for a superficial treatment (e.g.a check of spelling or grammar only, or brushing-up, or proof-reading), because that is all that he or she can afford, or because time is limited.
Even if a superficial treatment is requested and provided, the editor should also make sure that the author understands the true extent of any problems that have been seen. This should all be done as positively as possible. If the relationship permits (e.g. when an experienced editor if giving advice to an inexperienced writer), editors should also remark on the good points of a piece of writing, to encourage the writer.
Back to Top